翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Fairmount, Maryland
・ Fairmount, New Jersey
・ Fairmount, New York
・ Fairmount, Newark, New Jersey
・ Fairmount, North Dakota
・ Fairmount, Nova Scotia
・ Fairmount, Philadelphia
・ Fairmount, Richmond, Virginia
・ Fairmount, Tennessee
・ Fairmount-Southside Historic District
・ Fairness
・ Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting
・ Fairness Campaign
・ Fairness Commissioner (Ontario)
・ Fairness dilemmas
Fairness Doctrine
・ Fairness for American Families Act
・ Fairness Foundation
・ Fairness in Music Licensing Act of 1998
・ Fairness is a Two-Way Street Act
・ Fairness measure
・ Fairness of the Russian presidential election, 2008
・ Fairness opinion
・ Fairness test
・ Fairness to Contact Lens Consumers Act
・ Fairney View, Queensland
・ Fairntosh Plantation
・ Fairoaks
・ Fairoaks Airport
・ Fairouzeh


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Fairness Doctrine : ウィキペディア英語版
Fairness Doctrine
The Fairness Doctrine was a policy of the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC), introduced in 1949, that required the holders of broadcast licenses to both present controversial issues of public importance and to do so in a manner that was—in the Commission's view—honest, equitable, and balanced. The FCC eliminated the Doctrine in 1987, and in August 2011 the FCC formally removed the language that implemented the Doctrine.
The Fairness Doctrine had two basic elements: It required broadcasters to devote some of their airtime to discussing controversial matters of public interest, and to air contrasting views regarding those matters. Stations were given wide latitude as to how to provide contrasting views: It could be done through news segments, public affairs shows, or editorials. The doctrine did not require equal time for opposing views but required that contrasting viewpoints be presented. The demise of this FCC rule has been considered as a contributing factor for the rising level of party polarization in the United States.〔E. Patterson, Thomas. "The News Media: Communicating Political Images." We the People. 10th ed. McGraw-Hill Education, 2013. 336. Print.〕〔

The main agenda for the doctrine was to ensure that viewers were exposed to a diversity of viewpoints. In 1969 the United States Supreme Court upheld the FCC's general ''right'' to enforce the Fairness Doctrine where channels were limited. But the courts did not rule that the FCC was ''obliged'' to do so.〔(''Red Lion Broadcasting Co.'' v. ''FCC'' ), decided June 8, 1969, also at (Excerpt from Majority Opinion, III A; Senate report cited in footnote 26). Justice William O. Douglas did not participate in the decision, but there were no concurring or dissenting opinions.〕 The courts reasoned that the scarcity of the broadcast spectrum, which limited the opportunity for access to the airwaves, created a need for the Doctrine. However, the proliferation of cable television, multiple channels within cable, public-access channels, and the Internet have eroded this argument, since there are plenty of places for ordinary individuals to make public comments on controversial issues at low or no cost at all.
The Fairness Doctrine should not be confused with the Equal Time rule. The Fairness Doctrine deals with discussion of controversial issues, while the Equal Time rule deals only with political candidates.
==Origins==
In 1949, the Mayflower Doctrine, which had forbid editorializing on the radio since 1941, was repealed. This made way for the Fairness Doctrine.〔 The 1949 FCC Commission Report served as the foundation for the Fairness Doctrine. It established two forms of regulation on broadcasters: to provide adequate coverage of public issues, and to ensure that coverage fairly represented opposing views.〔Jung, D.L. (1996), ''The Federal Communications Commission, the broadcast industry, and the fairness doctrine 1981-1987'', New York: University Press of America, Inc.〕 The second rule required broadcasters to provide reply time to issue-oriented citizens. Broadcasters could therefore trigger Fairness Doctrine complaints without editorializing. The commission required neither of the Fairness Doctrine's obligations before 1949. Until then broadcasters had to satisfy only general “public interest” standards of the Communications Act.〔Donahue, H.(1988). ''The battle to control broadcast news''. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press〕〔Report on Editorializing by Broadcast Licensees, 13 F.C.C. 1246 ())〕
The doctrine remained a matter of general policy and was applied on a case-by-case basis until 1967, when certain provisions of the doctrine were incorporated into FCC regulations.〔Donald P. Mullally, "The Fairness Doctrine: Benefits and Costs", The Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 4 (Winter, 1969-1970), p. 577〕
In a 1969 textbook case, the United States courts of appeals, in an opinion written by Warren Burger, directed the FCC to revoke Lamar Broadcasting's licence for television station WLBT due to the station's segregationist politics and ongoing censorship of NBC network news coverage of the US civil rights movement.〔(The FCC & Censorship: Legendary Media Activist Everett Parker on the Revocation of WLBT’s TV License in the 1960s for Shutting Out Voices of the Civil Rights Movement ), Democracy Now, March 06, 2008〕

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Fairness Doctrine」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.